Skip to main content

WHAT WOULD YOU SAY?

 

AFTER READING the two articles about "visiting foreign specialists practicing medical treatments in Myanmar", my adrenaline ran high.

Why?

The articles were written by medical doctors and published in Kyay Mone on June 15 and 21. Both articles urged Myanmar Medical Council (MMC) to restrict foreign specialist doctors from giving medical treatments to Myanmar patients during their short visits here.

I am disappointed. One, the articles failed to address the root cause of the problem; Two, they drew an unfair comparison between Myanmar and England, for example. Finally, the mindset of Myanmar doctors hasn't changed.

I'm neither medical doctor nor associated with MCC. I'm just an ordinary patient seeking specialist medical treatment. So my point of view on the issue is entirely from a patient's perspective. I can understand their positions for writing these articles -- to warn the harms of unsolicited medical practices, sovereignty infringement, lost benefits for the country, etc. But I'm saddened when I find there's no place in their heart for the patients.

The articles failed to address the root cause of the problem. The writer doctors completely overlooked the present situation of our country's health sector. They ignored the fact there is a severe shortage of specialist doctors and it's the main reason why patients turn to foreign doctors in search of an alternative.

It's also the main reason why foreign specialists can find their way into our country and give medical treatments to patients with limited registration (conditional medical license) in spite of the fact it doesn't give them the right to practice medicine here. The truth is they are able to do it now because there is a sizable demand for their expertise. The demand comes from us the patients. It's very costly to seek a medical treatment abroad -- everyone knows it. We patients want to go abroad only when necessary services/tests are unavailable locally. In many cases, we have no choice but to go abroad. The high cost can be cut down to one third when patients can see a visiting foreign specialist here. That's why foreign specialists are welcomed here. That's why Myanmar Medical Council turns a blind eye to the situation, in a bid to help patients seek proper specialist treatments and technology without having to burn a hole in their pocket.

The writers drew a comparison between Myanmar and other neighboring countries and as far away as England. It's unfair and unrealistic in any possible way. Actually, they should know better (than patients). Comparing our health standards, rules and regulations with other countries is like blind ponnas examining an elephant in our text books. Once our medical standards reached those of the neighboring countries, requirements for foreign specialists -- as suggested by the writers -- would be automatically in place. Then Myanmar Medical Council and relevant state bodies can raise the bar for foreign specialists who really want to practice medicine here. (They should know what their lecturers do when they get sick seriously.)

Last but not least, I'm very disappointed Myanmar doctors haven't changed their mindset. Mindset for meritocracy, healthy competitiveness, sharing, compassion, humbleness, etc. all lack in their articles. In my own personal experiences, most of Myanmar specialists fail to possess these personalities and triumph over their ego-centric commercial success. As a patient, I'm willing to read what Myanmar specialists are doing to raise the medical standards of our country, how they care about their patients, instead of a mere wake-up call for Myanmar Medical Council to protect their own benefits.

W. Nyan Win
23/6/2016


Check it out on Facebook by clicking on the link below:
<iframe src="https://web.facebook.com/plugins/post.php href=https%3A%2F%2Fweb.facebook.com%2Fwinston.nw%2Fposts%2F10208832321021618&width=500" width="500" height="695" style="border:none;overflow:hidden" scrolling="no" frameborder="0" allowTransparency="true"></iframe>
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Dislike what I post? Write your comments to me. Postings are just my personal thoughts.

Popular posts from this blog

THE MOST FREQUENT QUESTION I GET FROM FOREIGNERS THESE DAYS IS: CAN AUNG SAN SUU KYI RULE? NO DOUBT THE NOBEL PEACE LAUREATE AND THE OPPOSITION LEADER HAS UNPARALLELED SKILLS. SHE HAS NUMEROUS GLOBAL ACCOLADES, INTERNATIONAL AND LOCAL SUPPORTS. BUT THE RECENT ELECTION WIN OF HER PARTY, THE NLD, CALLS FOR A NEW LEVEL OF QUALIFICATIONS TO BE ABLE TO LEAD AN ELECTED CIVILIAN GOVERNMENT, LAST SEEN IN BURMA SINCE 1962. IT'S A JOB most demanding of an activist-turned-politician. The job requires not only leading a civilian government but also cleaning up the mess former military governments left to rot in the country for several decades. Aung San Suu Kyi seemed to realize even before the Nov 8 polls, winning elections is one thing and leading a government is another. Hence, she drew a clear line between politicians and technocrats, separating their careers in a way that best suits the situation. After the elections, she told her elected representatives "not to fancy the p...
Post a Comment
Read more
THE OPPOSITION PARTY, NLD, WON A LANDSLIDE VICTORY IN PARLIAMENTARY POLLS HELD ON NOV. 8. THE CHARISMATIC PARTY LEADER, AUNG SAN SUU KYI, SAYS THE WINNER IS NOT THE NLD; THE REAL WINNER IS THE PEOPLE. WHAT THIS ELECTION WIN MEANS FOR THE NLD AND THE PEOPLE? I WAS NERVOUS and sleepless throughout the night waiting for the day's break of Nov 8. It was probably the longest, self-imposed vigilante in my life and I didn't feel bad a bit. I knew I wasn't alone.  Burma's first most important general elections since 1990 were held on that day. It's important in many ways: free and semi-fair and inclusive. But the fact that the electoral processes were organized under a  controversial constitution -- and the  opposition National League for Democracy (NLD) ignored all improbabilities and took part in it without much scrutiny -- was the salient point, making it one of the most important elections in quarter of a century of this country's turbulent  re...
Post a Comment
Read more
EVER THINK OF DONATING PART OF YOUR LIVER TO A LIVER PATIENT? IT'S SCARY -- EVEN TO THINK -- BUT PERHAPS THE BRAVEST DECISION YOU'LL EVER MAKE IN YOUR LIFE. YOU THINK YOUR ACTION MIGHT SAVE ONE LIFE, BUT ACTUALLY YOU'RE SAVING MANY LIVES. IN BUDDHISM -- or any other religions -- donating an organ to someone who needs it most is incomparable act of merit-making and saving-life. No act is more so selfless than giving one or more of your working organs to save life of a fellow human being. But before you become a liver donor, you have to go through a series of blood tests and screening. You need to meet the following requirements. You are: Aged between 18 and 55; Have a minimum body weight of 50 kg;  Have the same blood group as the recipient or blood group O; Have to do a number of blood tests and screening of your liver; Are are generally healthy with no health issues. If you passed all the basic requirements, you are pretty much sure to become a liver don...
Post a Comment
Read more